Thanks for your prayers. My Dad is restless and is wheezing but in better shape than what I expected. He is talking and ambalatory. I may be mistaken but I don’t think this is his time. He is one tough guy.

Buy the truth, and sell it not; also wisdom, and instruction, and understanding.

And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
———————-

Similar to what Joe Friday said “Just the facts, maam, just the facts.” It is “just the truth…just the truth” . But that is the last thing that is being delivered to us. Everywhere you look it is just lies, deceit, and deception. It seems that if one is to get to the truth, he has to dig and dig deep. What is on the surface is just lies. Just about everything that comes from the government is lies. For example, what do we know now about the official stories about the following subjects:

Remember the Maine - Lies
Lusitania - Lies
Remember Pearl Harbor - Lies
Gulf of Tonkin - Lies
JFK assasination - Lies
MLK assasination - Lies
RFK assasination - Lies
USS Liberty - Lies
Iraq I - Lies
Iraq II - Lies
911 - Lies upon lies
Weapons of Mass Destruction - Lies
Afghanistan - Lies
Swine Flu - Lies
Global Warming - Lies
Vaccines - Lies

The history books that parrot the official stories of some of the above topics are funded and approved by the foundations that have an interest in concealing the truth. The last thing that those that control the government want is the masses to know the truth for if they did, they would no longer be among the living.

So in my quest for truth I have to wade through a lot of stuff that I once thought off the wall and try to find evidence to either accept it or to reject. It is a hard task for there is a lot of disinformation out there. But as a result of what I know about the government, I automatically put any information that emanates from it on the suspect pile.

My heart is with you - nothing easy in this for anyone. You are in the right place, doing the right thing, but then you already know that.

…Yah…..excellent….revolution is comming…love that group Young Americans for Liberty..lots of kids getting involved is good

Your a good son …and a good guy too…Hold your fathers hand …

http://www.thatsfit.com/2010/01/18/low-fat-caused-obesity-epidemic/?icid=main|htmlws-main-n|dl2|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thatsfit.com%2F2010%2F01%2F18%2Flow-fat-caused-obesity-epidemic%2F

http://www.naturalnews.com/News_000354_California_budget_deficits_government_spending.html

Too bad many of you live in enemy terratory! Many of those congressmen have received hundreds, even thousands of tea bags so the “noted” list is quite long.
In our conservative part of Texas, our Congressmen and senators and Governor attend the Tea Parties and support all our protests. My state representative is very active in the Tea Party movement as is my Congressman. Unfortunately they are presently in the minority but help is on the way - from Boston, from Nevada and many other states. The full calvary is due to arrive in force in 2012! Deadeye

I am sitting up with my father in the hospital tonight. He is in congestive heart failure with pneumonia. I only have my laptop without my email setup, so I will get back to you tomorrow on the project.

There was a bunch of reasons that the Vikings lost but the refs gave the Saints the game at the end. Never mind the pass by Farve when he might have been able to get a first down by running the ball(or at least put the ball within field goal range). I thought they had a good shot just before the penalty for 12 men on the field. How does a good team pull a boner like that when the game is within field goal range? Oh, well. I believe that the Colts will feast on the Saints and do it with ease. Meanwhile, go gold. I would love to see a nice move up tonight and tomorrow.

the U.S. government could “nationalize the federal reserve or set up a separate government-owned bank for this purpose”. I expect that most readers who check your 20:52 posting will be so put off by what they read in that link that they will not get far enough down into the article to get to the sentence I quoted above. Thanks for posting this link. Cheers. Equiz.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2206121/posts

Before seeing you 20:52, I had decided to close off this Sunday by congratulating you for holding Goldtent together in the past hours through the potentially divisive topics of Hitler, the banksters, Jews in Hitler’s Germany, and all the side shoots of those topics. I am glad Goldtent got through the day without rudeness. Thanks for helping to moderate these potentially explosive topics.

Tomorrow we have markets again, and I look forward to seeing how the knowledgeable ones, like Seabridge with significant PM wealth in the ground, will fare when intelligent investors figure out how to identify and invest in PM companies that have control over PM wealth in the ground. Cheers. Equiz. Now I will read your 20:52.

By David Rose

The scientist behind the bogus claim in a Nobel Prize-winning UN report that Himalayan glaciers will have melted by 2035 last night admitted it was included purely to put political pressure on world leaders.

Dr Murari Lal also said he was well aware the statement, in the 2007 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), did not rest on peer-reviewed scientific research.

In an interview with The Mail on Sunday, Dr Lal, the co-ordinating lead author of the report’s chapter on Asia, said: ‘It related to several countries in this region and their water sources. We thought that if we can highlight it, it will impact policy-makers and politicians and encourage them to take some concrete action.

‘It had importance for the region, so we thought we should put it in.’

Chilling error: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change wrongly asserted that glaciers in the Himalayas would melt by 2035

Dr Lal’s admission will only add to the mounting furore over the melting glaciers assertion, which the IPCC was last week forced to withdraw because it has no scientific foundation.

According to the IPCC’s statement of principles, its role is ‘to assess on a comprehensive, objective, open and transparent basis, scientific, technical and socio-economic information – IPCC reports should be neutral with respect to policy’.

The claim that Himalayan glaciers are set to disappear by 2035 rests on two 1999 magazine interviews with glaciologist Syed Hasnain, which were then recycled without any further investigation in a 2005 report by the environmental campaign group WWF.

It was this report that Dr Lal and his team cited as their source.

The WWF article also contained a basic error in its arithmetic. A claim that one glacier was retreating at the alarming rate of 134 metres a year should in fact have said 23 metres – the authors had divided the total loss measured over 121 years by 21, not 121.

Last Friday, the WWF website posted a humiliating statement recognising the claim as ‘unsound’, and saying it ‘regrets any confusion caused’.

Dr Lal said: ‘We knew the WWF report with the 2035 date was “grey literature” [material not published in a peer-reviewed journal]. But it was never picked up by any of the authors in our working group, nor by any of the more than 500 external reviewers, by the governments to which it was sent, or by the final IPCC review editors.’

In fact, the 2035 melting date seems to have been plucked from thin air.

Professor Graham Cogley, a glacier expert at Trent University in Canada, who began to raise doubts in scientific circles last year, said the claim multiplies the rate at which glaciers have been seen to melt by a factor of about 25.

‘My educated guess is that there will be somewhat less ice in 2035 than there is now,’ he said.

‘But there is no way the glaciers will be close to disappearing. It doesn’t seem to me that exaggerating the problem’s seriousness is going to help solve it.’

One of the problems bedevilling Himalayan glacier research is a lack of reliable data. But an authoritative report published last November by the Indian government said: ‘Himalayan glaciers have not in any way exhibited, especially in recent years, an abnormal annual retreat.’

When this report was issued, Raj Pachauri, the IPCC chairman, denounced it as ‘voodoo science’.

Having been forced to apologise over the 2035 claim, Dr Pachauri blamed Dr Lal, saying his team had failed to apply IPCC procedures.

It was an accusation rebutted angrily by Dr Lal. ‘We as authors followed them to the letter,’ he said. ‘Had we received information that undermined the claim, we would have included it.’

However, an analysis of those 500-plus formal review comments, to be published tomorrow by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), the new body founded by former Chancellor Nigel Lawson, suggests that when reviewers did raise issues that called the claim into question, Dr Lal and his colleagues simply ignored them.

For example, Hayley Fowler of Newcastle University, suggested that their draft did not mention that Himalayan glaciers in the Karakoram range are growing rapidly, citing a paper published in the influential journal Nature.

In their response, the IPCC authors said, bizarrely, that they were ‘unable to get hold of the suggested references’, but would ‘consider’ this in their final version. They failed to do so.

The Japanese government commented that the draft did not clarify what it meant by stating that the likelihood of the glaciers disappearing by 2035 was ‘very high’. ‘What is the confidence level?’ it asked.

The authors’ response said ‘appropriate revisions and editing made’. But the final version was identical to their draft.

Last week, Professor Georg Kaser, a glacier expert from Austria, who was lead author of a different chapter in the IPCC report, said when he became aware of the 2035 claim a few months before the report was published, he wrote to Dr Lal, urging him to withdraw it as patently untrue.

Dr Lal claimed he never received this letter. ‘He didn’t contact me or any of the other authors of the chapter,’ he said.

The damage to the IPCC’s reputation, already tarnished by last year’s ‘Warmergate’ leaked email scandal, is likely to be considerable.

Benny Peiser, the GWPF’s director, said the affair suggested the IPCC review process was ‘skewed by a bias towards alarmist assessments’.

Environmentalist Alton Byers said the panel’s credibility had been damaged. ‘They’ve done sloppy work,’ he said. ‘We need better research on the ground, not unreliable predictions derived from computer models.’

Last night, Dr Pachauri defended the IPCC, saying it was wrong to generalise based on a single mistake. ‘Our procedure is robust,’ he added.

On Friday I had a very interesting conversation about tea bags with the national organization.  There’s plenty of interest in the fun idea expressed here recently, even though Tenters weren’t overly excited about getting involved personally.  It’s not just about money, it’s also about participation, especially in simple, effective (and fun) acts done by many people together.  But if you insist on sending money, let me give you my address!!!  *GB

Let’s hope that the ten million new guns are a warning to tptb that they should not take an angry population for granted, and that a peaceful revolution can be achieved this time.

Irish, I would have carried that hose for you in a heartbeat.  Woulda had to stop a couple of times to take photos, though.  That might be the secret to not getting too tired or overworked!

Your mention of something Mayan prompts me to share a link to an interview on the CMN site that I listened to today.  It’s with an interesting man by the name of Drunvalo Melchizedek:

www.consciousmedianetwork.com/members/drunvalo.htm

A friend steered me to Drunvalo when I asked him what he felt is the most valid info about 2012, which I haven’t been interested in at all until hearing this interview.  I love Drunvalo’s take on 2012, or more accurately, on the period of time from now until sometime in 2015.

One doesn’t have to believe everything he says in order to take many wonderful things from the interview, including his claim that the popular so-called ‘Mayan prophesies‘ didn’t come from the Mayans!  Talk about hijacked history and the repeated telling of lies until they are accepted as fact…  One of the most important things mentioned in the interview is that humankind’s ‘fall’ was a result from going from acting from our hearts to our heads, which most are still in today.  The most important thing we can do is get back in our hearts.  Drunvalo says the extreme changes in this era will include the ’saving’ of those who are back in their hearts, regardless of their beliefs.  Those still in their heads won’t make it.  Hiding in a cave won’t help either, nor will any amount of guns & ammo, etc.  This is in line with what I understand.

A few days ago I posted a link to interviews with George Green and to his “Handbook for the New Paradigm”.  So far I’ve only read the first 27 pages of the first of the three books, but so far it is right in line with what Drunvalo says and it goes into detail of how to allow the future we want.  This certainly isn’t accomplished by fighting or arguing or focusing on what we don’t want.  The handbook can be downloaded free or read here.

This song always seems appropriate:

  *GB

“A very thin veneer of civilisation between a tea party and a lynch mob.”
The Tea Parties are modelled after the Boston Tea Party. The citizens threw the Tea in the Harbor and warned the Crown that the new tea tax was too high and would not be paid or tolerated. When the crown responded with more of the same, revolution followed.

In 2009, hundreds of cities have had Tea Party gathering with many millions participating. The theme was peacefull and patriotic with speeches to tell the Crown that various things will no longer be tolerated: out of control spending and taxes, more and bigger socialist governmennt, amnisty and benefits for illegal immigrants, Unlimited creating of dollars out of thin air, Czars running our government, buying Congressional votes with bribes, threatened gun registration, ignoring our Constitution and ignoring States rights, using citizen’s tax money for abortions, Banks running our economy, Wall street using fraud and deceit to make profits, and quite a few other things!

The revolution at the ballot Box has already started and will grow bigger and fearce with big money determined to vote the Radicals out. I believe that will happen next November and in 2012. You simply can’t realize the anger and determination - almost every community has active groups meeting and growing weekly preparing for November and 2012. Money bombs on the internet raises several million dollars for a conservative candiate in a single day. This is happening from our mayor and city councils to state representatives to U.S. Congressmen and Senators. I have sent money to a dozen conservative candiates from Boston to Kentucky, So. Carolina, Texas, etc. as have thousands of other donors and we have barely started.

We have reached a breaking point - sent the money to conservative candiates because it will be worthless or gone if we don’t! John Kennedy made the point that people will be heard at the ballot box or there will be real revolution. I believe he was right. This is bigger than most people realize because the main stream media has not given out the facts as to the size and magnitude of this movement. There have been close to 10 million guns sold since Obama was elected - there is lots of fear and preparation for the worst by many peace loving citizens. Do not under estimate what is happening politically that is not being reported in the news with the exception of Fox news. If the Republic is saved, credit should go to the modern day Paul Reveres - Rush, Glenn, Hannidy, Savage and too many more to name. Deadeye

 looking good so far tonight.

FUNDING PUBLIC HEALTH CARE WITH A PUBLICLY-OWNED BANK:
HOW CANADA DID IT

Ellen Brown
www.webofdebt.com/articles
January 21, 2010

The story goes that Churchill offered a woman 5 million pounds to sleep with him. She hedged and said they would have to discuss terms. Then he offered her 5 pounds. “Sir!” she said. “What sort of woman do you think I am?” “Madam,” he replied, “We’ve already established that. Now we’re just haggling over the price.”

The same might be said of President Obama’s health care bill, which was sold out to corporate interests early on. The insurance lobby had its way with the bill; after that they were just haggling over the price. The “public option” was so watered down in congressional deal-making that it finally disappeared altogether.

However, the bill passed both Houses by razor-thin margins, and the stunning loss on January 19 of the late Ted Kennedy’s Democratic seat to a Republican may force Obama to start over with his agenda. The good news is that this means there is still a chance of getting legislation that includes what Obama’s supporters thought they were getting when they elected him – a universal health care plan on the model of Medicare.

That still leaves the question of price, but all industrialized countries except the United States have managed to foot the bill for universal health care. How is it that they can afford it when we can’t? Do they have some secret funding source that we don’t have?

In the case of our nearest neighbor Canada, the answer is actually that they do. At least, they did for the first two decades of their national health service — long enough to get it up and running. Now the Canadian government, too, is struggling with a mounting debt to private banks at compound interest; and its national health service is suffering along with other public programs. But when Canada first launched its national health service, the funding came from money created by its own central bank. Canada’s innovative funding model is one that could still be followed by a President committed to deliver on his promises.

The Canadian National Health Service Today

Despite what you may have read in the corporate-controlled press, studies show that Canadians are generally happy with the care they receive; and they live an average of 2.5 years longer than Americans. They receive free health service for all diagnostic procedures, hospital and home care deemed medically necessary. People can choose the general practitioners they want; there are no deductibles on basic care; and co-pays are low or zero. Care continues despite changing jobs, and no one is excluded for having a pre-existing condition. Drug prices are negotiated by the government and are paid with public money for the elderly and homeless. For the rest of the population, cost-sharing schemes are arranged between private insurers and provincial governments, with most provinces requiring families to pay small monthly premiums (generally around $100 for a family of four).

According to a 2007 study, the government pays for more than two-thirds of all Canadian health care costs. The US government, by contrast, pays for less than half of these costs. In 2007, the US spent a staggering 16% of GDP on health care compared to 10% in Canada. Health costs paid for out-of-pocket by Canadians amount to less than $300 per capita annually.

But while that arrangement may look good to people in the U.S., it is only a shadow of Canada’s former system. Between 1990 and 2007, the portion of health care costs covered by the Canadian government fell a dramatic 74.5%, chiefly due to a change in how the program was financed. In its early years, Canada’s public health system was funded under a provision of the Bank of Canada Act allowing the Bank to create the money to finance federal, provincial, and municipal projects on a nearly interest-free basis.

Money Created the Old-fashioned Way – by the Government Rather than the Banks

What was extraordinary about the Bank of Canada, however, was not so much that it created money on its books as that it managed to wrest that power away from the private banking monopoly. All banks actually create the money they lend simply with accounting entries. This fact was confirmed by Graham Towers, the first governor of the Bank of Canada, in hearings in 1935. Asked whether banks create “the medium of exchange,” he replied:

“That is right. That is what they are there for. . . . That is the banking business, just in the way that a steel plant makes steel. The manufacturing process consists of making a pen-and-ink or typewriter entry on a card in a book. That is all.”

The decision to fund government programs through a publicly-owned central bank was driven by a crisis much like that in the U.S. today. The country was in the throes of the Great Depression, and the money supply had radically contracted, causing businesses to close and unemployment to soar. Many Canadians blamed the private banks for making conditions worse by failing to extend loans.

Prior to the 1935 Bank of Canada Act, private banks in Canada issued their own banknotes, which were regulated less by the government than by the Canadian Banker’s Association. The country’s largest private bank, the Bank of Montreal, served as the government’s de facto banker. By the eve of the Great Depression, interest on Canada’s public debt had reached one-third of government expenditures, and many officials believed that the government needed a central bank to come up with the money to pay its foreign debts. A Royal Commission was put together in 1933 which supported creating a Bank. A major debate then ensued over whether the central bank should be public or private.

Much of the credit for the Canadian public banking model goes to a Canadian mayor named Gerald Gratton McGeer. He has been largely lost to history, and his book The Conquest of Poverty has been long out of print; but according to local historian Will Abrams, it was McGeer’s lengthy presentations to the Ottawa Common Banking Committee that clarified for bankers, economists and legislators how well a publicly-owned bank could work. McGeer’s model was based on the public banking system of Guernsey, an island state between Britain and France. The Guernsey government began issuing currency to pay for public works as far back as 1816. To this day, its system of publicly-issued money has allowed its inhabitants to maintain full employment and enjoy quality infrastructure, while paying modest taxes and without suffering from price inflation.

The Bank of Canada became publicly-owned in 1938 under Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King, a staunch supporter of McGeer’s vision for a public central bank. King maintained:

“Until the control of the issue of currency and credit is restored to government and recognized as its most conspicuous and sacred responsibility, all talk of the sovereignty of Parliament and of democracy is idle and futile. Once a nation parts with the control of its currency and credit, it matters not who makes that nation’s laws. Usury, once in control, will wreck any nation.”

What Can Be Done by a Government Issuing Its Own Currency

Along with New Zealand, Australia and other progressive countries, Canada proceeded to fund infrastructure and social programs using national credit issued by its own central bank. The potential of this new credit tool for the Canadian economy was first demonstrated in World War II, in which Canada ranked fourth among the Allies for production of war goods. Under the Returning Veterans Rehabilitation Act of 1945, some 54,000 returning vets were given financial aid to attend university. The Department of Veterans Affairs provided another 80,000 vets with vocational training, and the Veterans’ Land Act helped 33,000 vets buy farmland.

After the War, the Industrial Development Bank, a subsidiary of the Bank of Canada, was formed to boost Canadian businesses by offering loans at low interest rates. The Bank of Canada also funded many infrastructure projects and social programs directly. Under the 1950 Trans Canada Highway Act, Canada built the world’s longest road and the world’s longest inland waterway (a joint venture with the United States), as well as the 28-mile Welland Canal. People over 70, regardless of income or assets, received $40 a month from the government under the Old Age Security Act; and children under 15 got a tax-free allowance of $5-$8 a month.

Canadians first began talking about a government-run health system during the Great Depression, but at that time the government felt it could not afford the service. Various provincial programs were launched in the 1940s, often to care for returning veterans. But it was not until 1957 that the Canadian federal health care system was actually initiated, with funding from the Bank of Canada. A Hospital Act was passed under which the federal government agreed to pay half its citizens’ bills at most hospitals; and a Diagnostic Services Act gave all Canadians free acute hospital care, as well as lab and radiology work. In 1966, the Hospital Act was expanded to cover physician services. In 1984, the Canada Health Act ensured that no medically-necessary care would include private fees or a charge to citizens.

A Misguided Economic Policy Kills the Golden Goose

For three decades, Canada paid for these projects through its own government-owned central bank, without sparking price inflation. Then in the late 1960s, a period of “stagflation” set in –rising prices accompanied by high unemployment. According to former Canadian Defense Minister Paul Hellyer, these elevated prices were the result of “cost-push” inflation, which could be traced to a combination of causes. Big labor unions, big government, and big corporations all negotiated top dollar for their contracts. In 1971, President Richard Nixon took the U.S. dollar off the gold standard, putting a strain on currencies in international markets. In 1974, the price of oil quadrupled, following a secret deal between Henry Kissinger and the OPEC countries in which the latter agreed to sell their oil only in U.S. dollars and to deposit the dollars in U.S. banks. Countries without sufficient dollar reserves had to borrow from these banks to buy the oil they needed, setting a debt trap that sprang shut when U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker raised interest rates to 20% in 1980.

These increased costs drove up prices worldwide; but in Canada, price inflation was blamed on the government drawing money from its own central bank. Under the sway of the classical monetarist theory promoted by U.S. economist Milton Friedman, the Canadian government abandoned its successful experiment in self-funding and began borrowing from private international lenders. These private banks created “credit” on their books just as the Bank of Canada had done; but they lent it to the government at compound interest, creating a soaring national debt. Today, interest on the debt is the Canadian government’s single largest budget expenditure — larger than health care, senior entitlements or national defense.

The provision of government-paid services is gradually being undermined by a combination of cuts to funding and provision of private services. Canada’s health care system is suffering along with the rest of the economy, necessitating the cutbacks and long waits for elective procedures described by critics. But the achievements of an earlier debt-free era attest to the sustainability of a system of public health care funded with money issued through the government’s own central bank.

Goosing the Economy Again

The Bank of Canada was created to end the hardships of the depression and give the government full responsibility for the health of the economy. As it turned out, the Bank also funded the health of the Canadian people.

The U.S. government could fund universal health coverage in the same way. Ideally, it would nationalize the Federal Reserve or set up a separate government-owned bank for this purpose. However, the same result could be achieved by borrowing from the privately-owned Federal Reserve, which always rebates the interest to the government after deducting its costs. The federal debt is never paid off but is just rolled over from year to year. Interest-free loans rolled over from year to year are the equivalent of debt-free government-issued money.

Contrary to popular belief, adding to the money supply in this way would not be inflationary. Inflation results when “demand” (“money”) exceeds “supply” (goods and services). In this case the new money would be used to create new goods and services, so supply would be kept in balance with demand. The result would particularly not be inflationary today, when we are suffering from a deflationary crisis. As in the Great Depression, money is not available to buy products and fund programs because the money supply itself has collapsed. The solution is not to slash programs but to put more money into the economy; and that can be done by authorizing the government to create the funds it needs through its own bank.

Ellen Brown developed her research skills as an attorney practicing civil litigation in Los Angeles. In Web of Debt, her latest book, she turns those skills to an analysis of the Federal Reserve and “the money trust.” She shows how this private cartel has usurped the power to create money from the people themselves, and how we the people can get it back. Her eleven books include Forbidden Medicine, Nature’s Pharmacy (co-authored with Dr. Lynne Walker), and The Key to Ultimate Health (co-authored with Dr. Richard Hansen). Her websites are www.webofdebt.com, www.ellenbrown.com, and www.public-banking.com.

Dear Friends,

The Chairman of the Federal Reserve and the Secretary of the US Treasury have credible threats to their tenure in office. MOPE has you convinced it means nothing to the US dollar.

Consider what would happen to any other currency on the planet if the same were true.

Tell the lie loud and long enough, and the populous will believe it UNTIL the real downside pain of the fundamental implications are felt.

Most people forget to quote (paraphrased above) the second part of Goebbels’ key lesson on the value and application of state propaganda (MOPE).

Sleep on Sheeples as you take the happy ride to the abattoir.

Second Thought For The Day:

Remember what happened to the US dollar versus the Swiss/DM when people started to realize the quality of leadership under the Carter Administration?

Reputation of management has a lot of input to a currency’s value.

Wish you were with me today.[to help carry stuff.haa] rememberthat long log that AAhnold Swartz ran over in Predator…I think I traversed that log today….way way in the jungle with 100 ft. of hose over my back…but beautiful rivers clean and fast …looking for Comex paper gold in river…found a great area where two rivers come together…both from way up in the high areas of Hummingbird Highwy..just back but have sluice set up with an armed guard tonight…my bones ache worse than I used to remember after a tough football game …and it is only tonight..gold better be up tonight and in the morning because I won’t be in good enough shape to throw a brick at anything.in the morning…so it is guarranteed WE GO UP!…..

Was tipped off and went to see a hidden Mayan mound ..it is an eye in midddle with 6 points of mounds around it….I didn’t believe it till I stood back a few feet and looked from a different angle …within the trees was maybe30,000 cubic yards of material that should not be there…and as we dug we found layers of river rock …except I had left the river bed 150ft. below..plus as we dug it was soft ground as opposed to very hard all around 200 yards away and a hollow thud thud as we tapped the earth in the hole….ran out of light and had to check the other equipment down river…and now I need Ben Gaye….lots of it….

…this week could be huge…

….set up for a SM crash ?

…which wouldbe another way of the banksters saying to the USA and the ROW too for that matter…if We are not happy….you wont be happy either….!

….

Ah, the wonders of life, if you’re not too busy fighting!

  *GB

web link to photos:  balloonbill.smugmug.com/Other/McKenzie-Pass